Role of the Holy Spirit and missionary journeys.

The Role of the Holy Spirit and the Missionary Journeys (Student-Facing Article)

Why this matters

Acts is not only a travelogue of apostles; it is the story of the risen Jesus continuing his work by the Holy Spirit through a witnessing church (Acts 1:1–2). If you miss how Luke narrates the Spirit’s agency, you will misread mission as human ingenuity rather than divine direction. This lesson equips you to trace (1) who the Spirit is and what the Spirit does in Acts, and (2) how the missionary journeys unfold under that guidance—from sending (Antioch) to preaching (synagogues/marketplaces), from signs and sufferings to churches with elders (Keener, 2012; Witherington, 1998; Bock, 2007; Bruce, 1990; Johnson, 1992; Turner, 1996; Dunn, 1990; Stronstad, 1984).

Learning outcomes

By the end, you will be able to:

Describe Luke’s theology of the Spirit as power for witness, purifier of community, and guide of mission—rooted in Israel’s promises and Jesus’s commission (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:8).
Explain Pentecost as programmatic and relate subsequent “Pentecost-like” moments (Acts 8; 10–11; 19) to inclusion and identity.
Trace how the Spirit directs and sustains the missionary journeys (Acts 13–20; 21–28): calling/sending, guidance, speech, signs, suffering, leadership formation.
Use a discernment toolbox from Acts (Scripture, prayer/fasting, prophetic words, consensus: “it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us,” 15:28).
Avoid common pitfalls (flattening Luke’s pneumatology into a single pattern; ignoring women and households; treating miracles as spectacle; reading strategy without Spirit).

1) Who the Holy Spirit is in Acts: presence, power, and promise-fulfillment

Luke presents the Spirit as the eschatological gift promised by the Father (Joel 2; Luke 11:13; 24:49), poured out by the exalted Son to empower witness and create a holy people for all nations (Acts 2:17–21; 1:8). The Spirit:

Empowers speech (parrēsia): “You will receive power … you will be my witnesses” (1:8; 4:8, 31).
Authenticates inclusion: falling on Samaritans (8), Gentiles (10–11), and Ephesians (19) in ways Jerusalem recognizes as the “same gift” (11:17).
Guides mission: speaks, forbids, redirects, and calls (8:29; 10:19–20; 13:2–4; 16:6–10).
Forms community: generosity (4:32–35), truthfulness (5:1–11), leadership discernment (6; 15), joy (13:52).
Empowers deeds: healings/exorcisms as sign-acts confirming the word (3; 5; 14; 16; 19) (Witherington, 1998; Keener, 2012; Stronstad, 1984; Turner, 1996).

Theologically, Luke’s Spirit is not an impersonal force but the personal presence of God continuing Jesus’s mission in and through the church (Johnson, 1992; Fee, 1994).

2) Pentecost (Acts 2): the program in miniature

2.1 What happens

The Spirit descends with wind and fire; disciples speak in the languages of the diaspora; Peter interprets with Scripture (Joel 2; Ps 16; 110), proclaims Jesus crucified and raised, calls for repentance and baptism, and promises the Spirit “for you and your children and for all who are far away” (2:38–39). The community forms around teaching, fellowship, table, and prayers, practicing generosity (2:42–47).

2.2 Why it matters

Pentecost is not a one-off emotional experience; it is a mission charter. Luke links Spirit → speech → Scripture-framed proclamation → repentance/forgiveness → communal life as the normal rhythm of gospel advance (Keener, 2012; Bock, 2007). The languages signal outward movement; fire and wind echo Sinai and temple imagery: God’s mobile presence now rests on a people (Turner, 1996; Stronstad, 1984).

2.3 Normative pattern?

Scholars debate whether Pentecost provides a fixed sequence (repentance → water baptism → Spirit) or a flexible pattern where the Spirit’s timing highlights inclusion (Dunn, 1990; Turner, 1996). Luke’s narrative shows variety—on purpose.

3) “Pentecosts” across the map: variety with a point

Luke narrates at least three “Pentecost-like” episodes to show that one and the same Spirit creates one multiethnic family:

Samaritans (Acts 8:4–25). They believe and are baptized; only later, through apostolic laying on of hands, do they receive the Spirit. Why the delay? Likely to visibly bind Jerusalem and Samaria into one fellowship, preventing a schism (Keener, 2012; Turner, 1996).
Cornelius’s household (Acts 10–11). The Spirit falls mid-sermon on uncircumcised Gentiles (10:44), before water baptism. This sequence reverses expectations to prove God’s impartiality; Peter: “Who was I to hinder God?” (11:17). This event becomes decisive evidence at the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15) (Bock, 2007).
Ephesian disciples (Acts 19:1–7). They had only John’s baptism; upon hearing the gospel, they are baptized into Jesus, and when Paul lays hands on them, the Spirit comes with tongues and prophecy—a miniature Pentecost planting the Spirit-empowered movement in Ephesus, the hub of Asia (Witherington, 1998; Keener, 2012).

Takeaway: Luke refuses a single mechanistic order; instead he stages variety to make a theological point—Samaritans, Gentiles, and diaspora Jews share the same Spirit, so they must share one table (Dunn, 1990; Turner, 1996).

4) How the Spirit guides mission: a toolbox from Acts

4.1 Prayer, fasting, and listening

At Antioch, leaders worship, fast, and listen; the Spirit says, “Set apart Barnabas and Saul…” (13:1–3). Mission begins in adoration and discernment, not in board-room calculus (Witherington, 1998).

4.2 Prophetic speech & visions

The Spirit speaks through prophets (13:2; 21:10–11, Agabus), visions (Peter, 10; Macedonian call, 16:9–10), and inner constraints (20:22–23). Guidance includes forbidding routes (16:6–7) and opening doors—note the “we” that begins at Troas, suggesting Luke’s presence at the moment of redirection (Hemer, 1989; Keener, 2012).

4.3 Scripture-soaked discernment

Decisions—Pentecost preaching (Joel/Psalms), Judas’s replacement (Psalms, ch. 1), Council policy (Amos 9, ch. 15)—arise from reading Israel’s Scriptures as fulfilled in Jesus and operative for the church (Bock, 2007; Bruce, 1990).

4.4 Communal consensus

Acts models consensus language: “it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us” (15:28). Discernment integrates experience (Cornelius), Scripture (Amos), Spirit testimony, and pastoral prudence (table-fellowship guidelines) (Bock, 2007).

5) Spirit and speech: bold proclamation as the engine of mission

Luke ties the Spirit principally to speech—Spirit-filled people speak (2:4; 4:8, 31). The speeches distill apostolic kerygma:

God’s promises to Israel
Jesus’s life, death, and resurrection
Eyewitness testimony
Call to repent/believe, promising forgiveness and Spirit (2; 3; 10; 13; 17; 26) (Witherington, 1998; Schnabel, 2012).

The result is parrēsia—public boldness in courts and marketplaces (4:13, 31; 28:31). Even defenses become evangelism (22; 24–26). The refrain “the word of God grew… multiplied… prevailed” interprets outcomes (6:7; 12:24; 19:20; 28:31) (Bruce, 1990).

6) Spirit and signs/wonders: deeds that reveal and relieve

Miracles in Acts are not motivational fireworks; they enact the kingdom, relieve suffering, and authenticate message and messengers:

Healings/exorcisms: the lame man at the Beautiful Gate (3), Aeneas and Dorcas (9), the cripple in Lystra (14), the slave girl in Philippi (16), unusual healings in Ephesus (19).
Nature/providence: prison doors open (16), a storm navigated by divine promise (27).
Judgment signs: Ananias/Sapphira (5), Elymas struck blind (13:9–12).

These acts often open doors for proclamation or expose counterfeits (Acts 19’s “seven sons of Sceva”), and Luke is careful to anchor them in real locales and social networks (Keener, 2012; Witherington, 1998).

7) The missionary journeys under the Spirit’s hand

7.1 Antioch’s sending (Acts 13–14): Mission One

Spirit says, church sends. Barnabas and Saul are commissioned with fasting and prayer, not hired (13:1–3). They move along synagogue networks, preaching Scripture-anchored good news. Highlights:

Cyprus: confrontation with Elymas; the proconsul believes—a sign that the gospel can penetrate elite circles (13:7–12).
Pisidian Antioch: programmatic synagogue sermon (13:16–41); mixed response leads to wider Gentile mission.
Lystra/Derbe: contextual preaching to pagans about the Creator; a lame man healed; tribulation met with church formation and elder appointment (14:21–23).

Spirit patterns: boldness amid opposition, healing as mercy and sign, churches with elders rather than loose converts (Schnabel, 2012; Witherington, 1998).

7.2 The Jerusalem Council (Acts 15): Spirit for unity

Gentile inclusion prompts debate. The assembly weighs experience (Cornelius), Scripture (Amos 9:11–12), and Spirit testimony (15:8), concluding with the crucial formula: “It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us…” (15:28). The church rejects circumcision as an identity boundary for Gentiles and issues table-fellowship guidelines to protect unity (Bock, 2007).

7.3 Macedonia and Achaia (Acts 16–18): Mission Two

Redirection to Europe: The Spirit forbids Asia and Bithynia; a vision calls them to Macedonia (16:6–10).
Philippi: a church emerges through Lydia (household/patronage), liberation of a slave girl (spiritual/economic clash), and a jailer’s household (16:11–40). Joy and singing in prison showcase Spirit-formed resilience.
Thessalonica/Berea: Scripture-testing Bereans; opposition drives them onward.
Athens: Spirit-led contextualization—from creation to judgment to resurrection—with quotations from poets; mixed outcomes (17).
Corinth: tentmaking with Priscilla and Aquila; a vision strengthens Paul; Gallio’s ruling provides a legal canopy for the movement (18:12–17).

Spirit patterns: guidance, households, women’s leadership, public legality leveraged for mission (Keener, 2012; Witherington, 1998).

7.4 Asia Minor hub: Ephesus (Acts 19–20): Mission Three

Spirit reception for John’s disciples (19:1–7).
Power encounters: exorcisms, book burnings—allegiance shifts from occult economies to the Lord (19:11–20).
City-wide disturbance: the Artemis guild riots when the gospel threatens profits; civic officials note Christians are neither temple-robbers nor blasphemers—Luke’s apologetic thread (19:35–41).
Elder formation: Paul’s Miletus speech (20:17–38) models Spirit-aware shepherding—watchfulness, generosity, tears, and God’s word of grace.
The collection for Jerusalem embodies Spirit-wrought unity between Gentile churches and Jewish poor (24:17).

Spirit patterns: regional diffusion (“all Asia heard,” 19:10), team ministry, pastoral oversight, economic impact without coercion (Schnabel, 2012; Witherington, 1998).

7.5 Trials, warnings, and the voyage (Acts 21–28)

Prophetic warnings (e.g., Agabus, 21:10–11) do not divert Paul but prepare the church for suffering with purpose.
Repeated defenses showcase the resurrection before rulers (Sanhedrin, Felix, Festus, Agrippa), while Roman officials often find no crime—Luke’s portrait of a movement lawful within the empire (Witherington, 1998).
Voyage/storm/shipwreck (27): the Spirit’s assurance preserves lives; Paul’s pastoral leadership stabilizes a terrified ship’s company; Rome hears the word “boldly and unhindered.”
The ending is open: the Spirit’s mission continues through readers (Bruce, 1990; Keener, 2012).

8) Spirit, holiness, and the social shape of the church

The Spirit does more than empower speech; the Spirit reweaves social life:

Truth and integrity: Ananias and Sapphira lie “to the Holy Spirit”; the judgment protects a nascent culture of transparent generosity (5:1–11).
Equity: The Seven are appointed to secure fair distribution to Hellenist widows, safeguarding unity for mission (6:1–7).
Gendered participation: Lydia (patron), Priscilla (teacher alongside Aquila), Philip’s daughters (prophets) show Spirit-gifted women advancing mission (Johnson, 1992; Witherington, 1998).
Ethnic reconciliation: Cornelius and Jerusalem Council hard-wire table fellowship into gospel practice—unity in the Spirit, not uniformity in culture (Bock, 2007).

9) Spirit and suffering: power under pressure

Acts weds the Spirit to joyful endurance: after beatings the apostles rejoice (5:41); Paul and Silas sing in prison (16:25); disciples are “filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit” amid persecution (13:52). Suffering is not mission failure; the Spirit uses it to advance witness and form resilient communities (Keener, 2012; Bruce, 1990).

10) Luke and Paul on the Spirit: complementary accents

Luke emphasizes the Spirit’s missionary power, public speech, and boundary-crossing inclusion. Paul (in his letters) highlights the Spirit’s work in justification/adoption, sanctification, and charisms in gathered worship (Rom 8; 1 Cor 12–14). Read together, they yield a full-orb pneumatology: identity in Christ (Paul) energizes witness in the world (Luke) (Fee, 1994; Dunn, 1990).

11) Reading toolbox: how to follow the Spirit in Acts

Ask location questions: Where are we on the Acts 1:8 map? What boundary is the Spirit crossing?
Track guidance verbs: “said,” “forbade,” “led,” “filled,” “revealed,” “seemed good.”
Watch the rhythm: Prayer → guidance → proclamation → response (belief/opposition) → community formation (elders) → perseverance.
Link word and deed: How does a sign interpret or open a speech?
Note social vectors: Synagogues, households, workshops, roads/ships. The Spirit uses ordinary structures (Hemer, 1989; Schnabel, 2012).

12) Common pitfalls (and better paths)

Pitfall: Reducing the Spirit to private experience.
Better: In Acts, the Spirit’s center of gravity is public witness and community formation (Stronstad, 1984; Witherington, 1998).
Pitfall: Demanding one fixed sequence for Spirit-reception.
Better: Let Luke’s variety teach you theology (Acts 2; 8; 10–11; 19): one Spirit, many sequences, same family (Dunn, 1990; Turner, 1996).
Pitfall: Treating miracles as decorative.
Better: Read them as compassionate signs that authenticate message and disentangle people from rival powers/economies (Keener, 2012).
Pitfall: Ignoring women/households.
Better: Mission expands through patrons, household heads, co-workers like Priscilla, Lydia, and Aquila (Johnson, 1992).
Pitfall: Reading Acts as a rigid blueprint.
Better: Extract principles (Spirit dependence, Scripture-framed preaching, shared leadership, generosity, unity-in-diversity) and contextualize (Witherington, 1998).

13) Worked examples (practice with the text)

A) Acts 13:1–12 (Antioch → Cyprus)

Observe: Worship-fasting → Spirit speaks → church sends → confrontation with Elymas → proconsul believes.
Explain: Mission flows from adoration, includes power encounter, reaches elite networks, and validates the message (Keener, 2012).
Apply: In analysis, map how prayer + sending recur before key advances (13:1–3; 14:23; 20:36).

B) Acts 10–11 (Cornelius)

Observe: Parallel visions, Spirit falls mid-sermon, tongues as sign of parity, Jerusalem debate resolved by experience + Scripture.
Explain: Luke dramatizes impartial grace; the sequence (Spirit before water) insists the basis of belonging is God’s gift, not badges (Bock, 2007).
Apply: Trace how this event shapes Acts 15 and later table practices.

C) Acts 19 (Ephesus)

Observe: Spirit reception, power over occult practices, economic repercussions, civic non-condemnation.
Explain: The Spirit reorders allegiance and economies without civil disorder; Luke advances an apologetic for peaceful public faith (Witherington, 1998).
Apply: Note how word “grew mightily and prevailed” (19:20) interprets the whole section.

14) Review questions (exam prep)

In ~800–1,000 words, explain how Acts presents the Spirit as both promise-fulfillment and mission director. Use Pentecost, Cornelius, and one episode from a missionary journey.
Compare Spirit-guidance in Acts 13 (Antioch) and Acts 16 (Macedonian call). What do these teach about prayer, providence, and planning?
Analyze Acts 15 as a Spirit-led council. How do experience, Scripture, prophecy, and consensus integrate?
Choose one city (Philippi, Corinth, Ephesus). Show how the Spirit’s presence reshapes households, economics, and public reputation there.
Argue, with texts, how suffering and joy cohere under the Spirit in Acts.

References (APA)

Bock, D. L. (2007). Acts (Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Bruce, F. F. (1990). The Acts of the Apostles: The Greek text with introduction and commentary (3rd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Dunn, J. D. G. (1990). Unity and diversity in the New Testament: An inquiry into the character of earliest Christianity (2nd ed.). London, UK: SCM Press. (See also Dunn, 1970, Baptism in the Holy Spirit, London: SCM.)

Fee, G. D. (1994). God’s empowering presence: The Holy Spirit in the letters of Paul. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.

Hemer, C. J. (1989). The Book of Acts in the setting of Hellenistic history. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

Johnson, L. T. (1992). The Acts of the Apostles (Sacra Pagina 5). Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.

Keener, C. S. (2012–2015). Acts: An exegetical commentary (Vols. 1–4). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Schnabel, E. J. (2012). Acts (Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

Stronstad, R. (1984). The charismatic theology of St. Luke. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.

Turner, M. (1996). Power from on high: The Spirit in Israel’s restoration and witness in Luke-Acts. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.

Witherington, B., III. (1998). The Acts of the Apostles: A socio-rhetorical commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Closing encouragement

Keep Acts 1:8 at the top of your notes and read every scene asking, What is the Spirit doing here to make us witnesses? Watch how prayer births sending, the word births communities, signs open doors, suffering fortifies joy, and consensus keeps the table set for every nation. That is Luke’s script for mission—God’s mission, by God’s Spirit, through God’s people.

New Testament Survey

Curriculum